Guide · Private market
Singapore's private property market in 2026: prices are shifting faster than you think
The private property market behaves very differently from HDB: different drivers, different risks and different opportunities. Prices are still going up, but more slowly, and yet buyers are turning up at new launches in big numbers. Here's why, what land prices are telling us about the next few years, and how some owners are repositioning without stretching their budget.
Prefer to watch? This guide follows the video, with extra detail and what has happened since.
In short:
- Price growth has slowed every year since 2021, but new home sales in 2025 topped 10,000 units. Buyers didn't leave; they became more selective.
- Active buyers look at leading indicators, above all land cost. Developers are paying more for land again, which sets the floor for future launches.
- Suburban land now costs what city-fringe land used to, and city-fringe land is starting to look like prime land.
- Owners of older, non-harmonised condos can often swap into a newer harmonised home for about the same money: sell high, buy low.
Slower growth, but buyers didn't disappear
The private property price index tells a similar story to HDB: prices are still rising, but the pace has clearly slowed.
| Year | Private price growth |
|---|---|
| 2021 | About 10.6% |
| 2022 | About 8.6% |
| 2023 | About 6.8% |
| 2024 | About 3.9% |
| 2025 | Less than 1% a quarter |
But activity didn't disappear. In 2025, more than 10,000 new homes were sold, against about 6,500 in each of 2023 and 2024. Buyers are still very active, especially at new launches. They've just become more careful and more selective.
Why: leading indicators, not lagging ones
It's not that buyers suddenly became optimistic. If anything, the opposite: every purchase now has to make sense on price, on future supply, and on how they'll eventually exit. A lot of people still look at lagging indicators: past prices, past performance, what has already happened. Useful, but backward-looking. The buyers who are active today focus on leading indicators: land cost, upcoming supply, interest rates and government policy.
In a slower market, you don't buy because prices went up last year. You buy because the next few years make sense. That's why transactions keep happening, especially at projects whose future fundamentals are stronger than their past numbers.
Land costs move first
Prices don't move randomly. They usually follow what developers paid for land a few years earlier. If land is expensive today, future launch prices have almost no choice but to be higher. And land costs move in cycles, like a roller coaster:
| Year | Average land price (psf ppr) | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | About $1,430, a peak | Strong growth, low interest rates |
| 2019 to 2020 | Down to about $977 | Higher interest rates, then COVID |
| 2021 | Up to about $1,298 | Market rebound, rates still low |
| 2022 to 2023 | Softer | Cooling measures, rising interest rates |
| 2025 | Climbing again, about $1,249 | Rates coming down, growth stabilising |
Developers are already paying more for land again, and that sets the floor for where future launches will go. Three recent tenders show it:
- Holland Link: Sim Lian's top bid was $1,432 psf ppr, 22% higher than the second bidder. That's not a small gap. When a developer is willing to pay that much more, they're not looking at today's market; they're looking at where prices will be when the project launches.
- Bedok Rise: about ten bids, with the top at around $1,330 psf ppr. Lots of developers chasing the same piece of land, at the same time as everyone says the market is slowing.
- Dunearn Road: nine bidders. When you see this kind of turnout again and again, it tells you developers are comfortable with these land prices because they can see how the numbers work at a future selling price.
When developer competition stays high, land doesn't come cheap, and when land isn't cheap, future launches can't be cheap: the cost is locked in years earlier. A lot of buyers assume a slower market means new launch prices will fall sharply. Look at land costs and you'll see that's very hard to happen. Instead of waiting for prices to magically become cheap, the smarter move is to be selective about what and where you buy.
The first-mover advantage
Projects launched earlier were built on land bought at lower prices. Compare them with the upcoming OCR sites:
| Project or site | Region | Land price (psf ppr) |
|---|---|---|
| Penrith (selling at an average of about $2,800 psf) | RCR | $1,154 |
| Lakeside Drive (now Lucerne Grand) | OCR | $1,132 |
| Bedok Rise | OCR | $1,330 |
| Chuan Grove | OCR | $1,376 |
These are OCR land prices, yet they're approaching or exceeding what an RCR site cost not long ago. So future OCR projects are likely to be priced closer to today's RCR prices. That shift is happening quietly in the background, and it's why the opportunity is in this window: buying projects secured at lower land costs, before the step up shows in future selling prices. You're not buying because the market is hot. You're buying because the cost structure of future supply is changing.
For a sense of what it means in dollars: Skye at Holland, in the CCR, was built on land at $1,285 psf ppr and has sold at an average of about $3,130 psf. An 850 sq ft unit at $2,500 to $2,700 psf is about $2.1 million to $2.3 million. As land costs rise, that budget buys a less central location than before. That's not because developers are greedy; the cost structure has moved up, and once land costs move, selling prices follow.
The buyer's V-shape window
At the bottom of the V is where you want to buy: land costs still relatively low, and interest rates starting to come down. Penrith's land, at $1,154 psf ppr, is low compared with where land is today. On the right side of the V are the future projects: Lakeside Drive at $1,132 and Bedok Rise at $1,330, OCR sites with much higher land costs relative to their location. Buying on the left side gives you a degree of protection: you enter before higher land costs show up in selling prices across the market.
Where the private market is heading
- OCR land now costs what RCR land used to.
- RCR land is starting to look like CCR land.
- CCR projects will likely set the next pricing benchmark.
Prices won't spike everywhere overnight. The whole curve is moving quietly, so decisions made today in the OCR and RCR, on projects that secured lower land prices, will matter a lot more in a few years.
Interest rates: the cycle repeats
When the economy slows, the stock market usually drops first. Then interest rates are cut to support growth. Once rates come down, borrowing gets cheaper, confidence slowly returns, property demand picks up, and prices move up. You can see the same cycle repeat on the chart in my video, again and again. That's why, looking at interest rates and the economy today, we can make a reasonable guess at where property prices are likely to go, even when the headlines look uncertain.
In 2025, the US Federal Reserve cut rates three times and guided for at least one more cut in 2026. That usually happens when growth is slowing and policymakers want to support activity, not when the economy is overheating. For property, lower rates ease mortgage costs, buyers become more comfortable, and demand comes back.
Sell high, buy low: swapping into a harmonised home
Put it together and this is how I see 2026. Owners of older, non-harmonised projects are sitting at good price levels: prices have moved up and resale demand is still there, so they're closer to the sell-high part of the curve. At the same time, harmonised projects are only starting to come into the picture, and some of today's harmonised launches were still built on land bought at lower prices: that's the buy-low opportunity.
So it's not about panic selling or rushing to buy. It's about repositioning: locking in what you've gained from an older asset and rotating into something more future-proof in layout, buyer demand and long-term liquidity. Here are three real examples from my video:
| Sell (non-harmonised) | Buy (harmonised) | What changes |
|---|---|---|
| Lentor Modern, OCR: 3-bedroom, 990 sq ft (about 930 sq ft once harmonised), sold for about $2.4 million | Penrith, RCR: 3-bedroom, 936 sq ft, sold for about $2.44 million | Almost the same money; a newer harmonised layout, a different buyer pool, stronger liquidity |
| Whistler Grand: 3-bedroom, about $2.0 million to $2.2 million | Faber Residence: 4-bedroom, about $2.3 million | A small top-up for a better layout standard and an extra bedroom |
| Park Colonial: 3-bedroom, 936 sq ft (about 880 sq ft once harmonised), about $2.3 million | Skye at Holland, CCR: 3-bedroom, 915 sq ft, about $2.39 million | Similar money; a different location, buyer pool and long-term demand |
Not stretching aggressively, not speculating: swapping into something more aligned with where buyer demand is heading, for about the same amount of money. Timing creates the advantage here. Not predicting the top or the bottom, but moving while the gap between what you own and what you can upgrade into still makes sense. I explain why harmonised layouts compete so strongly in my guide on harmonisation and your resale price.
Three things to focus on
- Timing. Not catching the exact bottom, but understanding where we are in the cycle: land costs and interest rates.
- Financing. How you structure your loan, cash flow and buffer. This matters more in a slower market than in a hot one.
- Strategy. Holding, upgrading, or repositioning: non-harmonised to harmonised, OCR to RCR, RCR to CCR.
Is an EC at $2,000 psf too expensive?
On the surface it sounds very high; a few years ago it would have shocked everyone. But compare it with OCR new launches. A few years ago ECs were much cheaper and the gap was much wider. By the time of my video, it had narrowed to about $500 psf:
| Now | Next phase | |
|---|---|---|
| OCR new launch | About $2,250 psf | Moving towards about $2,500 psf |
| New EC | About $1,750 psf | – |
| Gap | About $500 psf | Closer to $800 psf |
So EC buyers aren't just buying something cheaper. They're buying a product that has historically moved towards private prices over time. Structurally, ECs still offer value, not because they're cheap, but because the relative gap is in your favour.
One more factor I mentioned in the video: if the EC income ceiling were raised, more households would qualify, buyers could borrow more, developers would price new ECs higher, and the gap with private condos could narrow further, which would be good for existing EC owners.
What has happened since
- The EC income ceiling was raised, from $16,000 to $18,000, at the National Day Rally in August 2026, for EC sites whose land tender closes on or after 24 August 2026: the change I talked about above.
- The EC rules changed on 8 May 2026: new ECs now have a 10-year MOP and no deferred payment scheme, and 90% of units go to first-timers. See my guide on the EC changes and your upgrade options.
- Land kept climbing. Lentor Central went for $1,278 psf ppr in March, Dover Drive in one-north for $1,556 and the second Dunearn Road site for $1,625 in April, and Berlayar Drive for a record $1,515 in August.
- Prices picked up again. URA's flash estimate shows private prices up 1.4% in the third quarter of 2026, with suburban non-landed homes up 2.2%.
- The launches sold. By 9 to 10 October, Penrith had only 4 units left and Faber Residence 13.
Holding a non-harmonised unit and wondering whether a swap makes sense? Everyone's numbers are different, so let's look at yours properly rather than rely on a generic answer.
Questions people ask me
Are private property prices still rising in 2026?
Yes, but more slowly than in 2021 and 2022. URA's flash estimate shows a 1.4% rise in the third quarter of 2026, after 0.5% in the second.
Will new launch prices fall if the market slows?
Very unlikely. Their land was bought years earlier at prices developers are still competing hard for, so the cost is locked in. A slower market makes buyers more selective; it doesn't make land cheaper.
What is a non-harmonised condo?
One approved before floor area rules were harmonised on 1 June 2023. Its stated size includes areas like air-con ledges and large balconies, so it looks bigger on paper than a newer harmonised unit with similar usable space.
Is it worth swapping an older condo for a new launch?
It can be, when the price of what you own and what you'd buy are close. In my examples, owners could move into a newer harmonised 3-bedroom, or even a 4-bedroom, for about the same money. Work out your sale proceeds and any seller's stamp duty first.
Are ECs still good value at $2,000 psf?
Compared with OCR new launches, yes: the gap was about $500 psf at the time of my video and could widen to about $800 psf as new OCR launches move towards $2,500 psf.
Related guides
- How land cost will push condo prices higher.
- GFA harmonisation: the hidden risk to your condo's resale price.
- Why property in Singapore won't get cheaper: the 3 forces.
- The EC rules changed: your upgrade options.
Price index, land price averages, EC and OCR price levels and the swap examples are as shown in my video of 9 February 2026. Land prices from URA tender results as reported by EdgeProp and others. EC rules as announced on 8 May 2026 and income ceiling as announced on 23 August 2026. Private price index for 3Q 2026: URA's flash estimate of 1 October 2026. Units left from my launch pages. This guide is general information, not financial advice.
